4 kPa]), difference +0.55 kPa, p = 0.64. Conclusion: Any virological response to treatment for chronic HCV infection results in regression of LSM by TE in patients with advanced liver disease (F3/F4). While the full significance of this remains unclear, post-treatment TE may aid management Antiinfection Compound Library ic50 and assist prognosis. Conflicts of Interest: MM and DHC have nothing to disclose. GD has received research funding, advisory board payments, speaker payments, and travel sponsorship from Gilead and research funding, advisory board payments and speaker payments from Janssen. GM has received research funding, advisory board payments

and speaker payments from Gilead and research funding and speaker payments from Janssen. M MARTINELLO,1,2 D HOW CHOW,2 M DANTA,3 GV MATTHEWS,1,2 GJ DORE1,2 1The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2Department of Immunology and

Infectious Diseases, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 3Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, learn more NSW Introduction: Phase III trials involving telaprevir (TVR) and boceprevir (BOC) demonstrated improvement in sustained virological response (SVR) as compared with prior standard of care for genotype (GT) 1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection (CHCV). Our objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TVR and BOC with pegylated-interferon (PEG) and ribavirin (RBV) in a “real world” setting. Method: Between 30 August 2011 and 1 May 2014, 57 patients had commenced TVR

or BOC with PEG and RBV for GT1 CHCV outside of a clinical trial at a single tertiary referral center; 50 patients have completed at least 12 weeks of post-treatment follow up (SVR 12) and are included for analysis. Demographic, clinical, adverse event and virological data were collected from baseline until date of last follow up (with loss to follow-up equated with treatment failure). Results: Of the 50 patients (male 39 [78%]; age 53 ± 8.8 years; 上海皓元 Caucasian 48 [96%]; HIV 8 [16%]; GT 1a 34 [68%]; cirrhosis 26 [52%]; treatment-experienced 29 [58%]), 34 (68%) received TVR and 16 (32%), BOC. The baseline median liver stiffness measurement by transient elastrography (FibroScan) was 13.1 kPa (IQR 8.8–20.25 kPa). SVR was demonstrated in 34 (68%), including 14/26 (54%) with cirrhosis. 14 (28%) did not complete the intended treatment course due to adverse events, with early cessation of TVR or BOC in 12 (24%). Dose reduction of PEG and/or RBV was required in 32 (64%). Significant anemia (Hb < 10 g/L) was documented in 30 (60%), with mean RBV level 2.33 mg/L (95% CI 2.07–2.58) at week 4 and 2.55 mg/L (95% CI 2.32–2.78) at week 8. No decompensated liver disease was observed. Conclusion: While response to treatment was relatively favorable, adverse events were frequent, highlighting the need for alternative therapies. Conflicts of Interest: MM, DHC and MD have nothing to disclose.