5. Displacements resulting from the zeroth order eddy-current phases (Fig. 5a and e) have spatially-uniform shifts of −0.78 mm for the unipolar sequence and 0.35 mm for Natural Product Library the bipolar sequence. The inclusion of first-order components resulted in comparable levels of displacement between the unipolar

and bipolar sequences, with maximum displacements of approximately 1 mm for both sequences. Including displacements from second-order phases (Fig. 5c and g) resulted in displacement levels that were substantially higher in the unipolar sequence (up to approximately 3 mm) compared to that of the bipolar sequence (up to approximately 1.5 mm). Displacement maps that included up to third-order phases (Fig. 5d and h) did not result in any discernible difference compared to those with up to second-order phases (Fig. 5c and g). Taking into account all diffusion directions (not shown in Fig. 5), the maximum displacements (relative to the b = 0 s/mm2 image) from third-order eddy-currents alone were less than 0.43 mm and 0.29 mm for the unipolar and bipolar sequence, respectively, for the axial selleck products plane. Larger contributions were found in the 5z3 − 3z(x2 + y2 + z2) component compared to other third-order components (shown in Fig. 2g). However, third-order displacements of less than 0.96 mm (for the unipolar

scheme) and less than 0.31 mm (for the bipolar scheme) were seen in both sagittal and coronal planes. In Fig. 6a and b, displacement maps are displayed for the unipolar and bipolar sequences, over the six diffusion directions. The maximum displacements in mm (computed for the sum of all eddy-current orders and representing the difference between the maximum positive and negative Cytidine deaminase image shifts over all diffusion-encoding directions) are displayed as contour/colour maps in Fig. 6c and d for the axial plane. Colour maps of the displacements

in three orthogonal planes are also shown. The maximum displacements were larger near the edges of the FOV, and showed deviations of up to 6 mm in the unipolar sequence, compared to 2.5 mm in the bipolar sequence. It is important to emphasize that the displacements in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 are indicative and calculated using the approximation that the phases have accrued linearly. In the bipolar sequence, linear correction resulted in significant differences (p < 0.01, using paired t-test) in MD compared to the uncorrected case. Linear or higher-order correction resulted in no significant differences in the MD in the unipolar sequence. However, for both unipolar and bipolar sequences, there were significant differences in the FA when linear correction was applied (compared to the uncorrected case, p < 0.01 for both sequences), with a marked decrease in the mean FA value with linear correction. No significant differences were seen following higher-order correction (compared to linear correction, p > 0.01 for both sequences).