52 Bilateral 8 band stimulation of DL-PFC and phase-synchronizing dual-channel frontoparietal stimulation both enhanced working memory performance.53,54 Phase-desynchronizing γ stimulation (180-degree phase offset) of occipital-parietal areas affected bistable motion perception.55 tACS also appears to modulate motor output; feedback tACS, based on measured tremors, in patients reduced tremor symptoms and therefore suggests that the phase of tACS plays an important role.56 α and β stimulation of the primary motor cortex had differential effects on motor Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical performance.51 In particular, β-stimulation slowed movement,57 but increased corticospinal excitability
measured by TMS.58,59 Similarly, the excitability of the occipital cortex was selectively increased by β-band tACS.60,61 γ-frequency tACS over the middle frontal gyrus enhanced fluid intelligence, while other frequencies failed to show an effect.62 High β-frequency Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical tACS improved contrast perception, but did not modulate spatial attention.63 Even higher-frequency stimulation (in the so-called ripple range, 140 Hz)64 enhanced excitability in the motor cortex.65 Likely, these effects of tACS crucially depend on the total Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical dose which involves session duration, amplitude, electrode size and position, and number of sessions. For example, an initial tACS study with short stimulation durations failed to
show modulation of excitability in any stimulation frequency band.66 Due to the lack of standardization of stimulation parameters, the direct comparison between studies is not feasible, and the field of tACS is in Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical its infancy due to the lack of commonly accepted stimulation effects.
Nevertheless, it has become clear that tACS can elicit electrophysiological and behavioral effects that depend on the stimulation frequency. Understanding the underlying mechanism will enable the targeted choice of stimulation frequency to treat specific network deficits that Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical may vary from patient to patient. The putative mechanism of frequency-specific effects as a starting point for such rational design is discussed below. Network mechanisms of tACS From the perspective of dynamic through systems theory, tACS corresponds to a periodically forced intrinsic oscillator. The periodic force corresponds to the applied sine-wave stimulation current, and the endogenous network selleck products oscillations represent the intrinsic oscillator. It is well known that stimulation of intrinsic oscillators at different frequencies has different effects. Most prominently and implicitly assumed in the abovementioned studies, stimulation at the endogenous or intrinsic frequency is, in general, an effective way to enhance that oscillation. However, the question arises as to what extent the intrinsic oscillator rejects stimulation at other frequencies. This is fundamentally important for the design of brain stimulation to manipulate cortical oscillations.