9% in open versus 0% in laparoscopic adnexal surgery. Only in appendectomies there was no difference between the two techniques [153]. There is some class I evidence in obstetrics supporting the theory that suturing the peritoneum increases this website the risk of adhesions [154]. It is therefore prudent to avoid peritoneal closure during laparotomies. Mechanical barriers In theory, inert materials that LY3023414 prevent contact between the damaged serosal surfaces for the first few critical days allow separate healing of the injured surfaces and may help in the prevention

of adhesion formation. Various bioabsorbable films or gels, solid membranes, or fluid barrier agents have been tested experimentally and in clinical trials. Hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) is the most extensively tested adhesion prevention agent in general surgery. Its safety with regard to systemic or specific complications has been established in many studies, including a safety study of 1,791 patients with abdominal or pelvic surgery, however there are concerns about a higher incidence of anastomotic leaks in cases in which the film is placed directly around the anastomosis [155]. Several prospective randomized controlled trials showed efficacy in reducing the incidence and extent of postoperative adhesions. In a prospective, randomized,

multicenter, double-blind study of 175 evaluable patients with colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure, compared Seprafilm with controls, The Seprafilm group Selleck VS-4718 had significantly fewer and less severe adhesions and well as of reduced extent [156]. A further prospective multicenter study, randomized 71 patients undergoing Hartmann’s resection into a Seprafilm and a control group: although the

incidence of adhesions did not differ significantly between the study groups, the Seprafilm group showed a significant reduction of the severity of adhesions [157]. Cohen et al, in a prospective multicenter trial, randomized 120 patients with colectomy and ileal pouch surgeries into a Seprafilm and a control group [158]. The outcomes included incidence and severity of adhesions and were assessed laparoscopically by a blinded observer at a second surgery 8 to 12 weeks later for ileostomy closure. Treatment with Seprafilm significantly reduced the incidence and severity of adhesions. Teicoplanin Kumar et al in a recent Cochrane collective review of 6 randomized trials with nongynecologic surgical patients found that Seprafilm significantly reduced the incidence of adhesions (OR, .15; 95% CI, .05-.43; P < .001) and the extent of adhesion (mean difference, –25.9%; 95% CI, –40.56 to –11.26; P < .001) [159]. Although there is satisfactory class I evidence that Seprafilm significantly reduces the incidence and severity of postoperative adhesions, there is fairly limited work on the effect of this adhesion reduction on the incidence of SBO.