A standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; 175 g/kg body weig

A standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; 1.75 g/kg body weight, up to 75 g) was performed in all subjects. Whole Body Insulin Sensitivity Index (WBISI) was used as index of insulin sensitivity, recently validated for the use in obese children and adolescents.18, 19 The hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp was performed in a subgroup of 41 subjects (16 male/25 female; 17 Caucasian/13 African American/11 Hispanic, mean age = 13.2, 95% CI = 11.9-14.5; mean BMI z-score = 2.39, 95% CI = 2.17-2.58). Twenty-six were normal glucose tolerant, 13 were IGT, and two showed type

2 diabetes. This subgroup did not differ from the main cohort for age, sex, race, BMI z-score, glucose tolerance, hepatic fat fraction (HFF), and body fat. Two intravenous PR-171 research buy catheters (one for blood sampling and one for infusion of glucose, insulin, and stable isotopes) were inserted in the antecubital vein Wnt inhibition of each arm after local lidocaine infiltration.17 The sampling arm was kept in a heated box for arterialization of blood. Hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity was measured

by a two-step hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp by infusing insulin as a primed continuous infusion at 4 mU·m−2·minute−1·and 80 mU·m−2·minute−1. The glucose infusion rates were calculated during the last 30 minutes of each step of the clamp and expressed as milligrams of glucose per minute per meter squared. Endogenous hepatic glucose production and glycerol turnover at baseline and during the two steps of the insulin clamp, along with the clamped glucose disposal rates, were calculated as previously reported.17 Total body composition 上海皓元 was measured by dual-energy

X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with a Hologic scanner. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were performed on a GE or Siemens Sonata 1.5 Tesla system.21 Measurement of liver fat content was performed by MRI using the two-point Dixon (2PD) method as modified by Fishbein et al.22 Using the MRIcro software program, five regions of interest were drawn on each image and the mean pixel signal intensity level was recorded. The HFF was calculated in duplicate from the mean pixel signal intensity data using the formula: [(Sin− Sout)/(2 × Sin)] × 100.23 Liver biopsy was performed in six subjects. All the information concerning the liver biopsy has been included as Supporting Information Material. Of the 85 subjects, only a subgroup of 18 subjects (three male/three female Caucasians, three male/four female African Americans, and three male/two female Hispanics) consented to undergo a subcutaneous fat biopsy. This subgroup had a higher mean age (age = 15.1, 95% CI = 10-19) than the main group (P = 0.004), but similar BMI z-score, percent HFF, sex distribution, ethnicity, and glucose tolerance. After administration of 0.25% lidocaine, a 1-cm scalpel incision was made inferior to the umbilicus, from which 2 g of subcutaneous adipose tissue was removed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>