After removal of this island with ER, this patient continued to have CR-IM status. Another patient had a 1-mm island 18 months after treatment, located near the Z-line, and the island was treated with APC. Focal IM below the neosquamocolumnar junction was found in 3 patients in single biopsy specimens obtained during follow-up. This finding was not reproduced in 33 follow-up biopsy specimens obtained at the neosquamocolumnar junction in 6 procedures. Of the 1272 biopsy specimens taken from

neosquamous epithelium, only 1 biopsy specimen (2 cm proximal to the neosquamocolumnar junction) showed focal subsquamous IM without neoplasia. In this study, 83% of the patients with BE selleck inhibitor ≥10 cm containing early neoplasia were effectively treated with RFA preceded by ER for visible abnormalities, when present. The treatment not only resulted in complete removal of all neoplasia but also complete endoscopic and histological removal of the whole BE segments. There were no severe complications, and, remarkably, these results were achieved by using an apparently similar number of treatments as

are CAL-101 in vitro used for BE <10 cm.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15 Our data are in accordance with the reported rates of complete remission of neoplasia and IM by Shaheen et al,13 even though longer BE segments were treated in our study. However, in contrast to the study of Shaheen et al, our treatment protocol permitted two instead of one circumferential ablation as well as an escape treatment with ER after the maximum number of RFA treatments in the case of residual endoscopic BE. Thus, our study shows similar complete remission rates of neoplasia and IM but with a more extensive treatment protocol. Compared with previous

RFA studies from our own group in which we used the same protocol, the remission rates for BE ≥10 cm were lower and did not reach the 95% to 100% complete remission of neoplasia and IM.9, 10, 11, 12 and 15 This difference in remission rate was a result of our decision in 4 patients to discontinue treatment because of poor healing and no visible regression in the surface area of BE despite medication compliance and increased esomeprazole Nabilone dosage (80 mg twice daily). We hypothesize that this reflects the severity of the underlying reflux disease in this selected group of BE patients. Nevertheless, in the remaining patients, complete remission of neoplasia and IM was achieved with a median of 3 RFA treatments, which is similar to the 3 to 4 RFA treatments that have been reported for shorter BE segments.9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15 During treatment of our patients, we encountered several technical challenges that have not been reported in patients with shorter BE. First, half of the patients were found to have a relative reflux stenosis at the upper end of the BE.