Genome Res 22(3):421–428PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Check Hayden

Genome Res 22(3):421–428PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Check Hayden E (2014) Is the $1,000 genome for real? Nature.com http://​www.​nature.​com/​news/​is-the-1-000-genome-for-real-1.​14530. Accessed 19 June 2014 Clarke A, Richards M, Kerzin-Storrar L, Halliday J, Young MA, Simpson SA, Featherstone Idasanutlin K, Forrest K, Lucassen A, Morrison PJ, Quarrell OW, Stewart H (2005) Genetic SAHA in vivo professionals’ reports of nondisclosure of genetic risk information within families. Eur J Hum Genet 13(5):556–562PubMedCrossRef Couzin-Frankel J (2013) Return of unexpected DNA results urged. Science 339(6127):1507–1508PubMedCrossRef

Dimillo J, Samson A, Theriault A, Lowry S, Corsini L, Verma S, Tomiak E (2013) Genetic testing: when prediction generates stigmatization. J Health www.selleckchem.com/products/ink128.html Psychol Dimmock D (2012) A personal perspective

on returning secondary results of clinical genome sequencing. Genome Med 4(6):54PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Downing NR, Williams JK, Daack-Hirsch S, Driessnack M, Simon CM (2013) Genetics specialists’ perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting. Patient Educ Couns 90(1):133–138PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Facio FM, Brooks S, Loewenstein J, Green

S, Biesecker LG, Biesecker BB (2011) Motivators for participation Protirelin in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research. Eur J Hum Genet 19(12):1213–1217PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Facio FM, Eidem H, Fisher T, Brooks S, Linn A, Kaphingst KA, Biesecker LG, Biesecker BB (2013) Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study. Eur J Hum Genet 21(3):261–265PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef GenomeWeb (2013) Reconsidering incidental findings http://​www.​genomeweb.​com/​blog/​reconsidering-incidental-findings. Accessed 26 Jul 2013 Goddard KA, Whitlock EP, Berg JS, Williams MS, Webber EM, Webster JA, Lin JS, Schrader KA, Campos-Outcalt D, Offit K, Feigelson HS, Hollombe C (2013) Description and pilot results from a novel method for evaluating return of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing technologies. Genet Med. doi:10.​1038/​gim.​2013.​37 PubMedCentral Goldman RE, Kingdon C, Wasser J, Clark MA, Goldberg R, Papandonatos GD, Hawrot E, Koren G (2008) Rhode Islanders attitudes towards the development of a statewide genetic biobank.

Comments are closed.