In one case, urine concentrations were also determined to be 700 mu g/kg for mephedrone and 190 mu g/kg for hydroxytolyl-mephedrone. All compounds were detected or quantified with an ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) system and an ultra performance liquid chromatography-time of flight/mass spectrometry (UPLC-TOF/MS) system. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, AZD7762 nmr Ltd.”
“Objective Biotechnology has promoted the discovery and development of new types of therapeutical agents for use in humans: biotech drugs offer innovative, targeted
therapies with enormous potential to address unmet medical needs of patients with cancer, AIDS and other serious diseases. However, the therapeutic application of these novel therapies poses serious problems concerning the connection between cost sustainability and innovative value. The aims of the present study are to assess the level of therapeutic innovation of biotech drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency between 2004 and 2011, to make a comparison with the trend of biotech drugs approved between 1995-2003, as previously reported, and to evaluate their economic impact on the Italian healthcare system.\n\nMethods The data source used was the European Public Assessment Dorsomorphin PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitor Report (EPAR) of human medicines available on European Medicines
Agency (EMA) website. The scores for therapeutic innovation were assigned according to the algorithm created by Motola et al. Drug expenditure data was obtained from Information Management System-Health Italy database. The list of drugs under analysis was downloaded from European Medicines Agency website and information on approved drugs were retrieved from the
European Public Assessment Reports as well as from PubMed databank.\n\nResults From 2004 to 2011, the European Medicines Agency approved 47 biotech drugs: 43 biopharmaceutical innovators and 4 vaccines. Our analysis involved 33 of the 47 biotech drugs approved: 18 products resulted in important therapeutic innovations, 6 in moderate and 5 in modest therapeutic innovations, 2 in pharmacological innovations and finally, 2 involved ERK assay only technological innovations. We also evaluated the influence of biotech drugs and their different scores for innovation with regard to expenditure as well as consumption. In 2010 and in 2011, the major part of expenditure and consumption concerned biotech drugs classified as important therapeutic innovations, while moderate, modest, pharmacological and technological innovators revealed very reduced contributions in this regard.\n\nConclusions Our study revealed that 50% of biotech drugs approved between 2004-2011 represented an important or moderate therapeutic innovation.