Island, Washington, DC, pp 117–126 Meadows D (2008) Thinking in s

Island, Washington, DC, pp 117–126 Meadows D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green, Vermont Meadows D, Randers J, Meadows D (2004) Limits to growth: the 30-year update. Chelsea Green, White River Junction, VT Mitchell M (2009) Complexity: a guided tour. Oxford University LY3039478 molecular weight Press, New York Munroe M (2003) The principles and power of vision: keys to achieving personal and corporate destiny. Whitaker House, New Kensington Norberg J, Cumming GS (2008) Complexity theory for a sustainable future. Columbia University Press, New York Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking science: knowledge and the

public in an age of uncertainty. Polity, Cambridge, UK Resilience Alliance (2007) Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: a scientists

workbook. http://​www.​resalliance.​org/​3871.​php Rifkin J (2009) The empathic civilization: the race to global consciousness in a world in crisis. Tarcher/Penguin, New York Rockström J et al (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14:32 Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday, New York Stanley A (1999) Visioneering: God’s blueprint for developing and maintaining vision. Multnomah, Sisters, OR Stanley A (2007) Making vision stick. Zondervan, Grand Rapids, MI Wagener T et al (2010) The future of hydrology: buy Blasticidin S an evolving science for a changing world. Water Resour Res 46:W05301.

doi:10.​1029/​2009WR008906 CrossRef World Commission on Environment, Epoxomicin cost Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New Alectinib molecular weight York”
“The problem and the vision Strong messages about the state of the planet are expressed by large scientific communities: the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Reid et al. 2005), the Stern Review (Stern 2006), the Fourth Assessment Report by IPCC 2007a), the fourth Global Environmental Outlook (UNEP 2007) and the Human Development Reports (UNDP 2007, 2009). Moreover, the World Bank joins this chorus with a dire outlook on global food security and climate change impacts (World Bank 2007, 2009). In synthesis, anthropogenic influences on global life support systems have reached a magnitude unprecedented in human history, levels that now jeopardise the well-being of humanity. This demands action in many domains of science and society. To that end, this article suggests how research can be organised, structured and conducted in pursuit of sustainability. Despite profound changes in nature1 and society, the disciplinary organisation of scientific knowledge production largely remains unchanged (Nature 2007). At the same time, it is recognised that we should address sustainability in interdisciplinary rather than disciplinary ways.

Comments are closed.