“
“Leprosy classically presents with cutaneous and neural involvement. Rheumatological manifestations are frequent, although often under-recognized. At times, CX-5461 these may present to a rheumatology clinic prior to the diagnosis of leprosy. Herein, we present our experience with patients referred with various rheumatological disorders who were subsequently diagnosed as having leprosy. This retrospective study (January 2001–September 2010) was carried out at the Department of Clinical Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, in northern India. Patients who were confirmed as having leprosy were included. Details regarding demographic and clinical

presentations were collected. Forty-four cases (30 male, mean age 40 ± 13.6 years and mean disease duration 18.7 ± 24.3 months) were identified. Musculoskeletal manifestations included arthritis (n = 22), swollen hands and feet syndrome (SHFS) (n = 11), tenosynovitis (n = 9), painful swollen feet (n = 9), arthralgias (n = 7) and vasculitis (n = 1). Distribution of joints mimicked rheumatoid arthritis

(n = 14) and spondyloarthropathy (n = 7). Arthritis and/or tenosynovitis were part of spontaneous onset lepra reaction in 28 cases. Other clinical manifestations were: paresthesias find more (n = 28), erythematous nodules (n = 25) and anesthetic patches (n = 7). Thirty-one patients had thickened nerves (ulnar n = 28, common peroneal n = 21). Eight patients did not have any cutaneous manifestations and had presented with SHFS and arthritis or tenosynovitis. These were labeled as pure neuritic leprosy. Most

of the patients responded to multidrug anti-leprosy therapy and glucocorticoids. Rheumatological presentations of leprosy may mimic RA, spondyloarthropathy or vasculitis. Pure neuritic variety and spontaneous type 2 lepra reaction pose unique diagnostic challenges. Increased awareness may avoid delay in diagnosis. Resminostat “
“To assess patient satisfaction with the rheumatology telemedicine service provided to a rural town in northern Australia. A prospective, questionnaire-based exploratory study of patients seen at the Mount Isa (rural town) rheumatology telemedicine clinics during 2012 was undertaken. Control groups included patients travelling over 3 h to be seen face-to-face in Townsville (tertiary referral centre), and patients seen at the infrequent face-to-face clinic in Mount Isa. A 5-point Likert scale was used to explore themes of communication, confidentiality, physical examination, rapport, medication safety and access. This study evaluated 107 rheumatology outpatients (49 telemedicine, 46 face-to-face Townsville, 12 face-to-face Mount Isa). Patients seen in Mount Isa travelled a median of < 10 km for either the telemedicine or local face-to-face appointments. The patients attending the Townsville face-to-face clinic travelled a median of 354 km.