Another problem is the choice of gases when using (28): both CO2

Another problem is the choice of gases when using (28): both CO2 and the indicator gas produce a set of Bohr equations. The estimated values of VD obtained using different gases are usually different from one another, and it is difficult to know which gas produces the more reliable results. A simple average of all the various estimates for each indicator gas may not be sufficiently stable, if some estimates Dabrafenib in vivo are erroneous. To overcome the problems described above, we propose a regression approach to improve the stability of the original Bohr equation. We re-write (28) as equation(29) (FE′−FE¯)=VDVT(FE′−FI′). Each breath produces a set

of values for x   and y  , corresponding to a point on a straight line equation(30) y=ax,y=ax,where

y=(FE′−FE¯), x=(FE′−FI′)x=(FE′−FI′), and a is the slope of the line, a = VD/VT. The optimal value of VD can be determined by finding the value of a that best describes the straight line using linear regression. Values (x, y) of both CO2 and the indicator gas from all breaths are used in the linear regression, in order to achieve a robust estimate selleck chemicals llc that incorporates results obtained using both gases. The proposed method uses all breaths without suffering from the instabilities induced by near-zero values in the original Bohr equation. The results shown in Section 5.2 indicate that using both gases achieves a more robust estimate than using a single gas, and that the proposed linear regression Thalidomide approach is more stable than using a simple average

of estimates obtained using the original Bohr equation. Twenty data sessions from healthy human volunteers were studied, with results obtained from one volunteer studied in detail in this paper, for illustration of the prototype system. Results obtained from all volunteers are then summarised in Fig. 4 and Table 3. Both N2O and O2 are injected as indicator gases. For each of T   = 2, 3, 4, and 5 min, data were collected for 10 min duration. For the tidal ventilation model, the data were divided into 20 data windows (i.e., each window contained 30 s of data); each of these windows of data was used to estimate V  D, V  A, and Q˙P. The mean and standard deviation of these estimates are shown in Fig. 3(a)–(c). The continuous ventilation model requires measurements of ΔFA and ΔFI, and hence the total duration of data was used to produce a single set of estimates for this method, against which our breath-by-breath tidal ventilation model will be compared. As described in Section 2, for the continuous ventilation model, a set of V  A and Q˙P estimates can be produced at any sinusoidal period T, using (11) and (13), where both O2 and N2O estimates contribute to the overall estimates.

For instance, how well does the STEPL model (or model inputs) acc

For instance, how well does the STEPL model (or model inputs) account for stream erosion, agricultural practices, or the presence of extensive wetlands? Does the geologist’s understanding of the relationship between land use/urbanization and sedimentation adequately explain the record, or are there other factors included in the model (such as stream erosion or wetlands) that should be addressed as well? Are there remaining questions related to either watershed management or the geologic history that might be better answered with a different methodology or more focused study? It is not feasible to conduct detailed

sediment core analyses for every stream or subwatershed. However, where such a detailed history spanning decades can be determined, a comparison of the sediment record with watershed modeling can prove instructive and supportive to geologic and watershed work throughout KPT 330 the region. The Gorge Dam is no longer a source of hydropower or cooling water

storage and is being evaluated for removal (Vradenburg, 2012). The sediment in the impoundment will be pumped out and contained on land, so it does not adversely Gemcitabine molecular weight impact downstream environments (Vradenburg, 2012). Once the dam is removed the impoundment reach will change from a region of deposition to one of non-deposition and erosion. The impoundment reach will take on the characteristics observed immediately upstream of today’s many impoundment where the river is swift, shallow, narrow, contains boulders and flows on bedrock. On September 18, 2011, a day of near average flow, we measured maximum flow velocities of 1.6 m s−1 and a water area of 11.6 m2 upstream of the

impoundment. Following the Gorge Dam removal the 900 m2 impounded water area will decrease to about 12 m2 and produce a dramatic increase in flow velocity. In addition, the nearly flat (0.00027 mm−1) impoundment water surface will increase to its steep pre-dam slope (0.014 mm−1), thus increasing boundary shear stress. As a result of these changes, the Cuyahoga River will have a greater ability to transport sediment and result in sediment bypassing within the gorge. These future conditions are similar to the photographically documented conditions in the gorge area before the dam was constructed (Whitman et al., 2010, pp. 35–36; McClure, 2012). This study helps to constrain the estimates of future increase in sediment load to the Lower Cuyahoga River should the Gorge Dam be removed. Downstream, the Port of Cleveland includes 9.3 km of channel in the lower Cuyahoga River and requires 250,000 m3 of sediment to be annually dredged in order to remain navigable (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2012). As the nation’s 48th largest port, the Port of Cleveland is an important economic asset, and potential changes to dredging needs are relevant (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2012).

A full review of the evidence for these impacts from throughout P

A full review of the evidence for these impacts from throughout Polynesia is beyond the scope of this article. Here we limit our review to the archeological and paleoecological evidence for transformation—from pristine ecosystems to anthropogenic landscapes—of three representative Polynesian islands and one archipelago: Tonga, Tikopia, Mangaia, and Hawai’i. Burley et al. (2012) pinpointed the initial human colonization of Tongatapu Island, using high-precision U–Th dating, to 880–896 B.C. From this base on the largest island

of the Tongan archipelago, Lapita peoples rapidly explored and established small settlements throughout the Ha’apai and Vava’u islands to the north, and on isolated Niuatoputapu (Kirch, 1988 and Burley et al., 2001). This rapid phase of discovery and colonization is archeologically attested by small hamlet sites containing distinctive Early Eastern Lapita pottery. Excavations in these hamlet sites and in the more Docetaxel in vitro extensive middens that succeeded them in the Ancestral Polynesian period (marked by distinctive Polynesian Plain Ware ceramics) reveal a sequence of rapid impacts on the indigenous and endemic birds and reptiles (Pregill and Dye, 1989), including the local extinction of an iguanid lizard, megapodes, and other birds (Steadman, 2006). Burley (2007) synthesized settlement-pattern data from Tongatapu, Ha’apai,

and Vava’u to trace the steady growth of human populations, demonstrating that by the Polynesian Plainware phase (700 B.C. to A.D. 400) these islands were densely settled. The Meloxicam intensive dryland agricultural systems necessary to support such large populations SCH727965 solubility dmso would have transformed much of the raised limestone landscapes of these “makatea” type islands into a patchwork of managed gardens and secondary growth. Historically, native forest is restricted to very small areas on these islands, primarily on steep terrain not suitable for agriculture.

The prehistory and ecology of Tikopia, a Polynesian Outlier settled by a Lapita-pottery making population at approximately the same time as Tongatapu (ca. 950 B.C.), was intensively studied by Kirch and Yen (1982). As in the Tongan case, the initial phase of colonization on this small island (4.6 km2) was marked by a significant impact on the island’s natural biota, including extirpation of a megapode bird, introduction of rats, pigs, dogs, and chickens, and presumably a suite of tuber, fruit, and tree crop plants. The zooarchaeological record exhibits dramatic declines in the quantities of fish, mollusks, sea turtles, and birds over the first few centuries, the result of intensive exploitation (Kirch and Yen, 1982 and Steadman et al., 1990). Pigs, which were introduced at the time of initial colonization, became a major food source during the first and early second millennia A.D., but were extirpated prior to European contact.